Culture, though invisible, holds immense influence over people but cultural diversity is often poorly understood or overlooked in peacebuilding initiatives. According to UNESCO, 75% of global conflicts have a cultural dimension, with 89% of ongoing armed conflicts transpiring in countries with limited intercultural dialogue.
The legacy of colonialism in African created multiethnic states rendering many governments vulnerable to high levels of cultural erosion and ethnic conflict, discrimination, inequality and marginalisation. The weight of tribalism in Africa cannot be underestimated.
Despite Africa being the most ethnolinguistically diverse continent, there is high potential for intercultural understanding. Many Africans communicate in multiple local languages alongside European languages and come from intercultural marriages. However, most diversity and inclusion strategies rely on selective datasets and therefore miss the overlapping identities of people and fail to create genuinely inclusive strategies. In fostering a fully inclusive culture, organisations in Africa would contribute to political stability, leading to improved trade conditions, thriving economies and a resilient private sector, creating a virtuous circle.
Selective datasets, which put highly diverse peoples into unnuanced categories that erase their specific skills and needs lead to missed opportunities and heightened conflict.
In creating policies and plans for diverse groups of people, holistic datasets that include all known ethnicities, languages, worldviews/religions and attributes such as gender, disability, age and sexuality are vital.
Our proposal highlights the importance of accurately identifying African ethnolinguistic characteristics within groups as a precondition for intercultural competence and healing divisions within the populations and identifies the technology to achieve this aim.
Launched in 2019, Diversity Atlas (diversityatlas.io) is the world’s only holistic tool for measuring cultural diversity. Underpinned by its proprietorial Global Database of Humanity of 42,000+ human attributes, its data structure allows analysis of key metrics of diversity, including variety, balance, disparity and representation. Our methodology and definition of cultural diversity were based on 300+ literature reviews.
Organisations in Africa and beyond have historically been forced to rely on unreliable and outdated ethnic datasets compiled by Christian missionaries during the colonial period as the most available sources of information on the histories and cultures of some groups.
Example of how most academic ‘lists’ operate in a three- or four-column system when compiling ethnic or tribal groups:
Zone: Africa
Ethnic Group: Bantu
Group: Cameroon Highland Bantu; Northeast Coastal Bantu
Sub-Group : Busam; Kung; Duruma; Gosha
We developed, just for Cameroon and ‘cultural groups’, a seven-column system:
Macro Zone : Africa
Region : Central Africa
Country : Cameroon
Region: Littoral Region
Ethnic Group: Sawa
Ethnic Sub-Group : Bankon
Village : Mandouka
This allows people to self-identify accurately and provides granular, accurate information.
Diversity Atlas offers an unprecedented path to thriving in the African context in its ability to assist in the equitable allocation and delivery of services and resources, help maintain cultures, increase intercultural understanding and foster peace