image


March 2019

March 2019

Universiteit van Stellenbosch Aftreedefonds (USAF) Growth Portfolio Factsheet



Period ending: 31-Mar-19


Performance

Portfolio size (R'million):

Portfolio Objective:

3,506.5


The table below shows the annualised performance of the USAF Growth Portfolio, net of manager fees, over various measured periods ended 31 March 2019, compared to the median and top quartile of the Alexander Forbes Global Manager Watch Best Investment View (BIV) survey.


USAF Growth Portfolio Aggregate Return


Global Manager Watch BIV median


Global Manager Watch BIV top quartile

3 months

7.1%

6.6%

7.0%

6 months

1.8%

0.5%

1.4%

1 year

8.4%

6.6%

7.8%

3 years

7.4%

5.3%

5.7%

5 years

8.1%

7.2%

7.8%

7 years

12.1%

10.2%

11.3%

10 years

13.4%

12.5%

13.3%


USAF Growth Portfolio Aggregate Return


Global Manager Watch BIV median


Global Manager Watch BIV top quartile

3 months

7.1%

6.6%

7.0%

6 months

1.8%

0.5%

1.4%

1 year

8.4%

6.6%

7.8%

3 years

7.4%

5.3%

5.7%

5 years

8.1%

7.2%

7.8%

7 years

12.1%

10.2%

11.3%

10 years

13.4%

12.5%

13.3%

Short Term:

Over the short term i.e. 6 month periods, the performance of the USAF Growth Portfolio should be better than the median performance of the global asset managers included in the Alexander Forbes Best Investment View survey.


Long Term:

Over the long term i.e. 3 year rolling periods, the performance of the USAF Growth Portfolio should be better than the top quartile of the global asset managers included in the Alexander Forbes Best Investment View survey.


Cumulative Performance

The chart below shows the monthly performance of the USAF Growth Portfolio (net of fees) relative to the Strategic Asset Allocation (SAA). The SAA is the assumed long term asset allocation for fully discretionary balanced portfolios. It also shows the cumulative net performance of the Growth Portfolio relative to the SAA and the CPI + 5.0% p.a. inflation benchmark on the right-hand axis.


For the purposes of this report the SAA has been set as follows:SA equity: 42%, SA nominal bonds: 13%, SA inflation linked bonds: 5%, SA cash: 5%, SA listed property: 5%, Global equity: 23%, Global bonds: 4%, Global property: 3%

Risk Profile: Aggressive



12.0% 400.0


10.0% 350.0


8.0% 300.0


6.0% 250.0


4.0% 200.0


2.0% 150.0


0.0% 100.0


-2.0% 50.0


Apr-09 Jul-09 Oct-09 Jan-10 Apr-10 Jul-10 Oct-10 Jan-11 Apr-11 Jul-11 Oct-11 Jan-12 Apr-12 Jul-12 Oct-12 Jan-13 Apr-13 Jul-13 Oct-13 Jan-14 Apr-14 Jul-14 Oct-14 Jan-15 Apr-15 Jul-15 Oct-15 Jan-16 Apr-16 Jul-16 Oct-16 Jan-17 Apr-17 Jul-17 Oct-17 Jan-18 Apr-18 Jul-18 Oct-18

Jan-19

Apr-09 Jul-09 Oct-09 Jan-10 Apr-10 Jul-10 Oct-10 Jan-11 Apr-11 Jul-11 Oct-11 Jan-12 Apr-12 Jul-12 Oct-12 Jan-13 Apr-13 Jul-13 Oct-13 Jan-14 Apr-14 Jul-14 Oct-14 Jan-15 Apr-15 Jul-15 Oct-15 Jan-16 Apr-16 Jul-16 Oct-16 Jan-17 Apr-17 Jul-17 Oct-17 Jan-18 Apr-18 Jul-18 Oct-18

Jan-19

-4.0% -



USAF Growth Portfolio SAA CPI +5% Cumulative Return USAF Growth Portfolio Cumulative Return SAA Cumulative Return

Risk Statistics

The table below sets out some key risk statistics for the USAF Growth Portfolio relative to the SAA for the period since inception (April 2009) to 31 March 2019.


Portfolio

Return achieved

Active return1

Standard deviation2

Downside risk3

Tracking error4

Sortino ratio5

Information ratio6

Beta7

Drawdown8

Active Drawdown9

USAF Growth Portfolio (10 years)

13.4%

0.1%

7.4%

5.4%

3.3%

2.5

0.02

91.8%

-9.4%

-11.5%

SAA (10 years)

13.4%

7.3%

5.5%

2.4

-7.3%


Notes

  1. Active return is the difference between the Actual Return achieved and the benchmark return over the relevant period.

  2. Variation of return (standard deviation) is a measure of how widely the return is dispersed – the lower this measure, the less risk. This measure has been annualised.

  3. Downside risk measures the dispersion of return below a minimum return (zero) – the lower this measure, the less risk of realising a negative return.

  4. The “tracking error” measures how much the return of the actual portfolio differs from the benchmark.

  5. Sortino ratio measures the excess return above a minimum accepted return (taken to be zero) divided by the downside risk – it therefore measures the extra return generated per unit of risk of realising a return below zero.

  6. The “information ratio” measures the extent to which the actual portfolio has outperformed the benchmark divided by the “tracking error” – it is therefore a measure of the extra return generated per unit of relative risk. An information ratio net of fees of 0.25 and higher is regarded as good.

  7. Beta is a measure of the volatility, or systematic risk, of a portfolio relative to the benchmark.

  8. The drawdown is the peak-to-trough decline of returns over a specific period.

  9. Active drawdown is the peak-to-trough decline of the active returns (relative to the benchmark) over a specific period.

image


Risk and Return Analysis

The chart below compares the risk (as measured by the standard deviation) and return characteristics of the USAF Growth Portfolio and benchmarks over the five years ended 31 March 2019.


8.2%


8.0%


5 YEAR RETURN P.A.

5 YEAR RETURN P.A.

7.8%


7.6%


7.4%


7.2%


Growth Portfolio Aggregate



Growth Po


rtfolio SAA, 6.5%,

Return ,

7.6%, 8.1%

8.1%


Global Manag


er Watch BIV top

Glo

bal Manager Watch B

median, 7.1%, 7.2%

IV


Growth Po


rtfolio SAA, 6.5%,

Return ,

7.6%, 8.1%

8.1%


Global Manag


er Watch BIV top

Glo

bal Manager Watch B

median, 7.1%, 7.2%

IV

quartile, 7.4%, 7.8%


7.0%

6.4% 6.6% 6.8% 7.0% 7.2% 7.4% 7.6% 7.8%

5 YEAR STANDARD DEVIATION P.A.


Manager Allocation Foreign Asset Split

The chart below shows the manager allocation of the USAF Growth Portfolio as at 31 March 2019.

The chart below shows the look-through allocation of the USAF Growth Portfolio’s global balanced mandate.

WTW

Diversified

Global Balanced

Allan Gray Domestic 23.6%


70.0%

30.9%

30.9%

60.4% 59.8%

60.0%


50.0%


40.0%


Coronation Domestic 22.5%


Investec Domestic 22.9%


30.0%


20.0%


10.0%


0.0%


9.1%10.1%


16.0% 14.6%


14.5% 15.5%

Int'l Equity EM Equity Int'l Bonds/Cash Int'l Prop


31-Dec-18 31-Mar-19


Asset Allocation

The chart below compares the actual asset allocation of the Growth Portfolio as at 31 March 2019 to that of the SAA.


31-Mar-19



50.0%

40.0%

30.0%

20.0%

10.0%

0.0%

-10.0%

SA Equity

Hedged SA

Equity

SA Prop

SA Bonds

SA Cash

SA

Commodities

Int'l Equity

Int'l Bonds/Cash

Int'l prop

Growth Portfolio

48.0%

1.2%

3.4%

11.5%

3.7%

1.3%

21.6%

4.5%

4.8%

SAA

42.0%

0.0%

5.0%

18.0%

5.0%

0.0%

23.0%

4.0%

3.0%

Over/underweight

6.0%

1.2%

-1.6%

-6.5%

-1.3%

1.3%

-1.4%

0.5%

1.8%


50.0%

40.0%

30.0%

20.0%

10.0%

0.0%

-10.0%

SA Equity

Hedged SA

Equity

SA Prop

SA Bonds

SA Cash

SA

Commodities

Int'l Equity

Int'l Bonds/Cash

Int'l prop

Growth Portfolio

48.0%

1.2%

3.4%

11.5%

3.7%

1.3%

21.6%

4.5%

4.8%

SAA

42.0%

0.0%

5.0%

18.0%

5.0%

0.0%

23.0%

4.0%

3.0%

Over/underweight

6.0%

1.2%

-1.6%

-6.5%

-1.3%

1.3%

-1.4%

0.5%

1.8%

60.0%


Total Expense Ratio (TER)


The estimated TER for the USAF Growth Portfolio is 0.74% p.a. for the one year ended 31 March 2019.

image


The TER is an annualised value (typically measured over a rolling three year period or since inception and expressed as %) and expenses included in the TER are:


  1. Annual asset management fees;

  2. Asset manager performance fees (if any);

  3. Bank charges;

  4. Audit fees;

  5. Taxes (eg VAT);

  6. Custodian and trustee fees;

  7. Costs related to scrip lending (if any).


Disclaimer


This report contains confidential and proprietary information of Willis Towers Watson, and is intended for the exclusive use of the Trustees of USAF. This report, and any opinions on or ratings of investment products it contains, may not be modified, sold or otherwise provided, in whole or in part, to any other person or entity without Willis Towers Watson’s prior written permission.

This report is based on information available to Willis Towers Watson at the date of this material and takes no account of subsequent developments after that date. In preparing this report we have relied upon data supplied to us by third parties. Whilst reasonable care has been taken to gauge the reliability of this data, we provide no guarantee as to the accuracy or completeness of this data and Willis Towers Watson and its affiliates and their respective directors, officers and employees accept no responsibility and will not be liable for any errors or misrepresentations in the data made by any third party.


Towers Watson (Pty) Ltd is an authorised financial services provider.