PhD/D Admin in Public Management and Development Planning
From the Head of Doctoral Programme:
Welcome to the School of Public Leadership! Thank you for your interest in our doctoral programme.
We are located in the Western Cape alongside the picturesque Winelands, in one of the most attractive coastal cities in South Africa. As a postgraduate student, you will enjoy the celebrated location as well as the academic ethos of Stellenbosch. The PhD or Doctorate in Public Administration is undoubtedly an advanced and senior postgraduate qualification that leads to the generation of new knowledge.
You have made an informed decision to embark on this new academic venture and it is our pleasure to guide you through the doctoral journey by offering our expert knowledge, skills and competencies in chosen fields of study. At the School of Public Leadership (SPL), our students work closely and diligently with supervisors to produce pioneering scholarly research that is path-breaking and innovative.
The School accepts a limited number of applications due to capacity constraints and therefore admission is based on available expertise. The closing date for applications is 31 May. I wish you an academically and intellectually stimulating experience and assure you that we are the School of Choice for your endeavour!
PhD Programme Administrator Head of Doctoral Programme
Mrs Riana Moore Prof Pregala Solosh Pillay
021-9184400 021-918 4341
This programme consists of three main phases: A proposal preparation and admission phase, a research and dissertation-writing phase and a formal examination phase.
CRITERIA FOR CONSIDERING YOUR APPLICATION:
The following are considered:
- Recognised and relevant Master's Degree with substantiating results.
- Minimum work experience, with at least three years in a leadership/managerial/supervisory capacity.
- Proven command of research methodology and experience in academic and scientific writing.
- A relevant and cogent research proposal, as per SPL Guidelines.
from historically disadvantaged communities are strongly encouraged to apply.
selection of candidates will be made by a selection panel appointed for this
PERIOD OF STUDY:
are required to complete their studies with a minimum period of two (2) years
and maximum of four (4) years.
- The School is committed to matching one or more
appropriate supervisor/s to the field of enquiry.
- The supervisors assume the role of mentor and provide
the necessary academic expertise and guidance required for the
endeavour. Our students are welcome
to engage supervisors on critical matters that impact on their research.
All these interactions are built on mutual trust, respect and ethical
are expected to maintain regular contact (personal meetings, telephone or Skype
conversations, written correspondence via email) with their supervisors.
the outset, there must be agreement on mutual expectations and
the pre-doctoral training workshop, both supervisory and student
responsibilities are comprehensively discussed.
THE DOCTORAL JOURNEY
PHASE 1: ADMISSION
Advertisements for the Doctoral Programme are placed on our Website
and/or the national newspapers commencing 1 March.
Applications close 31 May.
The admission process has the following steps:
STEP 1: Application Process
comprises a detailed CV and copies of all qualifications, together with a comprehensive
research proposal (minimum of 20 pages with at least 30 references), to be
forwarded to Mrs Riana Moore (Email email@example.com)
on or before 31 May. The
applications are screened by a panel chaired by the Head of Doctoral Programme
and prospective students will be invited to the compulsory research enhancement
workshop. Successful candidates may then go to the University of Stellenbosch
(US) portal via www.sun.ac.za: students/postgraduate student/application
to sun, then click on apply online.
STEP 2: Appointment of Supervisor/s
The identification and appointment of an appropriate supervisor/co-supervisor is managed as an internal SPL process. Appointment of a supervisor is subject to supervision capacity. Successful candidates will be informed of the outcome of applications during the last week of June. It is expected then that you and your supervisor meet to discuss consultation arrangements and prepare a final research proposal.
STEP 3: Doctoral Research Enhancement Workshop
The School of Public Leadership offers a two-day compulsory and intensive Doctoral Research Enhancement Workshop in July.
The purpose of this Workshop is to focus, inter alia, on enhancing the research proposal, research methodology and programme success; to develop the conventions of scientific research writing; to outline and clarify the responsibilities of students and supervisors, and to increase plagiarism awareness and consequences.
This Workshop will be facilitated by colleagues from the School of Public Leadership and specialists from the external environment.
At the end of the Workshop, it is expected that you start reworking your proposal under the guidance of your allocated supervisor and prepare for presentation to a Faculty Admission Committee.
STEP 4: Presentation to Faculty Admission Committee
You will present your proposal to a Faculty Admission Committee mid-September.
The Committee consists of academics from SPL and representatives from other academic environments of the Faculty Board. The Committee will meet before Faculty Board Meetings to endorse Research Proposals. The Faculty Board sits once a term.
STEP 5: Submission to Faculty Board
The comments of the Faculty Admission Committee will be discussed between student and supervisor and necessary amendments/corrections effected. The final research proposal will be submitted to the Faculty Board for approval and notification to Stellenbosch University Senate.
STEP 6: Registration of Doctoral Degree
You will subsequently be informed of registration for the Doctoral Degree.
PHASE 2: RESEARCH AND
now have officially embarked on the doctoral research journey. In order to
ensure that the journey is completed effectively, a Memorandum of Understanding
between you and SPL, serving as a performance contract, will be entered into
and kept on file at the beginning of the first full academic year. You and your
supervisor/s are also required to complete compulsory progress reports every
six (6) months, which are forwarded to Mrs Riana Moore (Email firstname.lastname@example.org) for record keeping and progress
research process requires good interaction between you and your supervisor.
Please note that before actual fieldwork/research operational data collection
commences, it will be expected of you as the researcher to submit various official
documents for ethical clearance on the Stellenbosch University Ethical Clearance
Platform. More information and access to the platform is available online: The
URL for the Infonetica site is https://applyethics.sun.ac.za/
ensure that your Inetkey is open to access the URL, especially if you are
working on campus.
will be required to login using your email@example.com and network password. Follow the instructions that
are applicable to you.
PHASE 3: EXAMINATION PHASE
appointment of examiners is a Faculty matter that is handled under supervision
of the Dean’s office. The examination panel consists of three independent
examiners, who were not in any way involved, in the preparation of the specific
considerations are taken into account in the appointment of examiners:
• Qualifications (preferably the same or
• Knowledge of the study field and topic
• National or international stature
• Appropriate practical experience
• Academic orientation (of
external examiners who do not hold an academic
• Deliberate strategy to prevent
over-utilisation of the same (internal and
external) examiners within a
• Relationship to candidate
• Independence of the examiner in general
examiners have six weeks in which to study the dissertation and to provide
their feedback in the form of an examiner’s report and a completed standard
report form to the Faculty Officer in the Dean’s office.
are not involved in any correspondence with the examiners on their official
appointment, despatching of dissertations to the examiners, or receipt of the
examiners’ reports. Doctoral candidates
may not under any circumstances communicate with the examiners about their
dissertations. Examiners may also not
communicate with one another about the content of the dissertation they are
required to evaluate.
of the School, in collaboration with the study leader, informs the Dean’s office
in writing that the dissertation is ready to be examined. This evaluation is
not necessarily based on content, but rather on:
• the structure of the document;
• the scope of the document (what is
expected of a PhD), and
• the technical finishing of the document.
evaluation should also be based on the question of whether the dissertation
contains the basic elements including:
• an introductory chapter;
• an in-depth literature review;
• a thorough description of the
• a presentation of the empirical results;
• an interpretation of the results,
leading to conclusions;
• the management implications
flowing from the empirical results and findings, and
• a summary of the study’s
contribution to the academic discipline of study.
ring-bound copy of the dissertation for each examiner has to be handed in at
the Dean’s office for examination.
Candidates need to submit their copies before or on 8 August of a
particular year (if they wish to graduate in December of that year), and
before 1 October of the particular year (if they wish to graduate in March/April
of the following year).
dissertation is handed in at the Dean’s office, the following information must
be confirmed by the Chair/Director of the relevant Department/School:
• That the examiners are
still available for the examination;
• That the dissertation is
ready to be examined;
• An additional requirement
is that the candidate includes a written declaration by an accredited language
editor to confirm that both the language and technical aspects of the
dissertation have been edited. Should the services of an accredited editor not
be used, the supervisor has to approve the editor whose services are being
used. A letter from this expert, confirming that proof-reading and editing was
done, must accompany the submission of the final version of the dissertation.
• That the dissertation has
been submitted via Turnitin, with sufficient evidence that excessive plagiarism
has not occurred.
NOTE: The dissertation will not be sent to examiners
if this required
documentation is not received.
Procedure for evaluating dissertations
- The candidate's dissertation is evaluated by each examiner individually.
- When all the written reports of all the examiners have been received, a quality control committee under the chairmanship of the Vice-Dean (Research) considers all the examiners' reports and decides whether the Faculty might meaningfully proceed with an oral examination. This report and the examiners' original reports are sent to the supervisor. The supervisor may discuss the contents of the reports with his or her student, but should still keep the reports confidential. Candidates are not allowed to have direct access to examiners' reports.
- It is expected of the candidate to submit a full written report with a list of all the changes that have been made, to the Faculty Officer in the Dean's office. This report should be submitted at least six days prior to an oral examination. It should be approved by the candidate's supervisor(s) before submitting it to the Faculty Officer, and has to be forwarded, together with the latest version of the dissertation, to the examiners prior to the oral examination.
- When a dissertation is referred back for further examination (and the oral examination therefore does not proceed), the study leader(s) and candidate are still not allowed to contact the examiners.
Recommendation to Senate
After a successful ORAL examination, the recommendations of the committee and the examiners' reports are sent to the Faculty Secretary and all the departmental chairs in the Faculty. During this period, an electronic copy of the dissertation is available in the Dean's office for perusal by faculty members. The Dean submits the recommendation of the examination committee and the individual examination reports to the Faculty Board. The Faculty Board makes a recommendation to the Senate for approval of the dissertation.
With a view to the graduation ceremony, the supervisor has to electronically submit the final dissertation and relevant information on the SunScholar system, by the due date.
The title of Doctor may only be used from the date of graduation.
List of doctoral supervisors
SPL currently offer supervision from experts in the following areas of specialisation:
Prof Johan Burger
- Public Financial Management & Cost Accounting
- Project Management
- Public Policy Analysis
- Municipal Financial Performance
- Public Sector Reforms
Prof Mark Swilling
- Sustainability transitions
- Sustainable cities
- Material flow analysis
- Transdisciplinary research methodologies
- New economic theory
Prof Frederik Uys
- Intergovernmental relations
- Performance management
Prof Josephine Musango
- Resource economics
- Energy technology assessment
- System dynamics
- Urban metabolism
Prof Martin De Wit
- Economic approaches to environmental assessment,management and policy
- Ecosystem services in urban contexts
- Environmental, energy and natural resource economics
- Integrated ecological-economic modelling
- Theology and ethics of the environment
Prof Reinette Biggs
- Social-Ecological Systems
- Regime Shifts
- Scenario Planning
Prof Pregala Pillay
021 918 4341
- Public Trust
- Service Delivery
- Women and Diversity
Dr Babette Rabie
- Policy evaluation
- Programme monitoring and evaluation
- Institutionalising M&E systems
- Organisational performance management
Dr Firoz Khan
- Development Planning and Management
- Developmental State and Governance
- Housing and Urban Studies
- Institutional Transformation
- Applied Economics and Informality
Dr Zwelinzima Ndevu
- People management/HRM
- Community Participation/Engagement
- Local government